Qasim and Suleiman’s Big Decision | Jemima’s Message To Pakistan | Ather Kazmi

itle: Lahore Court Decision Raises Questions on General Election Preparations

In a recent video, Sami Ibrahim addresses the latest developments regarding the general elections in Pakistan, highlighting a significant decision by the Lahore Court that has put a halt to the election preparations. The video was recorded on the night of December 14th, a Friday, bringing attention to the critical decisions made the previous night.

The background of the issue lies in the appointment of district returning officers by the Election Commission of Pakistan, who were primarily chosen from the bureaucracy. This sparked a campaign led by Imran Khan’s party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), urging that returning officers should be selected from the judiciary rather than the government bureaucracy.

The matter reached the Lahore Court, where Barrister Umair Niazi, a close associate of Imran Khan, presented the case, arguing against the appointment of returning officers from the bureaucracy. The court’s decision was to send the matter to a larger bench under Chief Justice Amir Bhatti.

Sami Ibrahim reveals that the Lahore Court’s decision has resulted in the suspension of the election commission’s notification, raising concerns about the possible delay in issuing the election schedule. He emphasizes that this move comes amid accusations that the justice system itself may be contributing to a postponement of the elections.

The video provides insights into the legal intricacies of the case, pointing out that the court’s decision may be interpreted as favoring PTI’s stance against the bureaucratic appointments. However, it also raises questions about the timing of this decision, considering Justice Baqir Ali Najfi’s track record in handling human rights cases and other matters.

Furthermore, Sami Ibrahim explores the implications of this decision on the level playing field for political parties, especially with PTI’s leadership facing legal challenges. He highlights the court’s acknowledgment of reservations and the need for transparent, fair, and impartial elections, expressing concern that failure to address these issues may harm the democratic process in Pakistan.

The video concludes with speculation about whether the decision aims to delay the elections or ensure a rigged outcome. Sami Ibrahim promises to delve deeper into this aspect in a subsequent video, leaving viewers eager for further analysis of the evolving political landscape in Pakistan.

Title: Controversial Remarks by Justice Tariq Masood Spark National Debate on Human Rights

In a recent video on their YouTube and Facebook channels, host Sami Ibrahim delves into a heated debate ignited by the controversial remarks made by Justice Tariq Masood during a Supreme Court session. Justice Masood expressed skepticism about the concept of human rights, throwing the book of Ayin on the table and questioning where these rights might lead the country.

The discussion unfolded as Mr. Ittizad Aizan addressed fundamental rights in the context of military courts. Justice Tariq Masood’s demeanor was likened to that of an angry woman in a household dispute, causing concern among the viewers about the direction of the judicial system. Notably, Justice Jawadas Khawaja objected to Justice Masood’s decisions, further fueling the debate.

The social media sphere is abuzz with criticism, questioning the judges’ attitudes towards human rights and the overall purpose of the legal system in Pakistan. Qazi Faiz Esa, in particular, expressed disappointment in Justice Tariq Masood’s conduct and decision-making process.

The video also touches on Justice Masood’s previous decisions, including one that overturned the administration’s decision in KPK High Court, leading to widespread arrests and a contentious atmosphere.

Switching gears, the video mentions a significant interview with the Secretary-General, who indicated the possibility of Pakistan accepting Israel. This stance contradicts Prime Minister Imran Khan’s firm rejection of recognizing Israel. The Secretary-General suggested that the situation could be reconsidered based on changing circumstances, sparking concerns about policy shifts.

The video also highlights other ongoing legal matters, including a request for Imran Khan’s ineligibility and permission to contest elections in the Lahore High Court. Additionally, it covers a case related to the Cypher trial and the delay in issuing a ruling by Justice Gul Hassan Aurangzeb.

The host concludes the video by discussing incidents of alleged repression, such as the arrest of singer Malku for performing a song in favor of Imran Khan, and criticizes the mainstream media for being a tool of manipulation and propaganda. The complex interplay of legal, political, and social issues paints a challenging picture for Pakistan, leaving viewers eager for further developments.