Imran Khan Gains Strong Position as Ishaq Dar Exposes Events in America Exclusive !
In a recent episode of the program “Political Diaries,” host Muhammad Azza Siddiq delved into the intricate web of political developments in Pakistan, shedding light on key players, surprising twists, and the looming uncertainty surrounding the upcoming elections.
Context:
The discussion revolved around the election schedule, recent decisions by the Supreme Court, and the unexpected turn of events that have thrown the political landscape into disarray. Speculations were rife about the possibility of the election being postponed, with alleged involvement from influential figures and foreign agencies.
Key Points:
Supreme Court Drama:
Siddiq highlighted the surprising conclusion of a Supreme Court case and the involvement of key figures like Shahbaz Sharif. The host expressed astonishment at the secrecy surrounding the developments and hinted at a possible connection to the Chief of the Army’s recent international visits.
Election Postponement Plot:
According to Siddiq, a significant portion of the political establishment, including Nigran Aqoomat, Muslim League Noon, and Shahbaz Sharif, was allegedly pushing for the postponement of the elections. The host suggested that this move was orchestrated to await a resolution on Nawaz Sharif’s legal issues, particularly with Chief Justice Qazi Faisal’s absence until January.
International Influence:
Siddiq claimed that the United States and Britain had exerted pressure for the timely conduct of elections. Allegedly, foreign agencies were alarmed by the Nigran setup’s agenda, including purported discussions about recognizing Israel. The host hinted at diplomatic maneuvering to ensure the elections proceed as planned.
Lahore High Court Decision:
The discussion delved into the Lahore High Court’s role in the matter. Siddiq questioned why a full court session was not convened, emphasizing the importance of Justice Pakistan Tariq in ensuring a transparent election process. The host expressed concerns about the clarity and finality of the Lahore High Court’s decision.
Election Schedule Confusion:
Siddiq highlighted the confusion surrounding the election schedule, mentioning a tweet by Ishaq Nair that was later deleted. He referred to conflicting reports and the Election Commission’s rejection of the initial schedule, adding to the overall uncertainty.
Imran Khan’s Legal Issues:
The host briefly touched upon Prime Minister Imran Khan’s legal challenges, stating that one punishment would not be left unaddressed. Siddiq suggested that the United States and Britain played a role in signaling the need for timely elections.
Conclusion:
The video concluded with a mix of political commentary, snippets from Siddiq’s TV program, and an unexpected transition to a light-hearted exchange about a potential election fight. The host ended with a series of rapid-fire statements, leaving viewers with more questions than answers.
“
Certainly, Moeed Peerzada discusses several significant developments in Pakistan over the last 48 hours in his YouTube channel. Here is a detailed summary:
Attempt to Postpone 2024 Elections:
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) attempted to place the responsibility for the February 2024 elections on Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Imran Khan.
Lahore High Court, led by Justice Baqir Najfi, played a role in this attempt.
Umair Niazi’s petition challenged the ECP’s schedule, arguing that government officials involved in election duties lack autonomy and can be influenced by higher authorities.
The Lahore High Court referred the case to a larger bench, delaying the decision.
Supreme Court Intervention:
The Supreme Court of Pakistan rejected the attempt to delay the elections, led by a three-judge committee including Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan.
The decision was critical in preventing the potential postponement of elections.
Chief of Staff’s US Visit:
Pakistan’s Chief of Staff visited the US for a five-day tour, meeting with military and diplomatic officials.
Notably, a meeting with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken included Pakistan’s DGI, General Nadeem Anjum, alongside the Army Chief.
A demonstration outside the Pakistani embassy in the US was reportedly hindered, with allegations of a conspiracy involving Imran Khan.
Imran Khan’s Family Concerns:
Imran Khan’s half-sister, Aleema Khan, expressed concerns over Imran Khan’s life, claiming that he faces a potential death sentence in the Cypher case.
Aleema Khan, after meeting with Aitazaz Ahsan, stated that Imran Khan and Shah Mahmood Qureshi may face severe legal consequences, including death and life imprisonment.
International Legal Actions:
Aitazaz Ahsan suggested that after potential adverse legal outcomes in Pakistan, international legal actions would be pursued.
This includes filing cases in the UK, approaching the International Court of Justice, and bringing a case against Donald Luke in the US.
The objective is to create international awareness and consciousness about the situation in Pakistan.
Media and Public Response:
Moeed Peerzada criticized the media for not comprehending the gravity of the situation, emphasizing that the issues go beyond Imran Khan and are crucial for Pakistan’s future.
He pointed out the role of government employees, whom he considers weak due to their dependency on the system.
The low turnout at the embassy event and media coverage restrictions on Imran Khan’s trial were also highlighted.
In summary, Moeed Peerzada aims to present a broader perspective on the unfolding events in Pakistan, emphasizing their significance for the nation’s identity, future, and the generations to come. The discussion covers political developments, international relations, legal challenges, and media dynamics, providing viewers with a comprehensive understanding of the current situation.
Title: Retired Military Officers Allegedly Dominate Key Civilian Institutions in Pakistan, Contributing to Corruption Concerns
In a recent video posted on social media by Rehan Tariq, a Pakistani commentator, concerns were raised about the significant influence of retired and serving military officers in key civilian institutions. Tariq highlighted that for the past 50 years, with only a few exceptions, major civilian organizations in Pakistan have been headed by military officials, suggesting a level of control by the army over these institutions.
According to Tariq, not only are top positions occupied by military officers, but even at lower levels, both serving and retired officers are found in various administrative roles. Examples cited include the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) with a current service general at its helm, and WAPDA (Water and Power Development Authority) being chaired by a retired general.
The commentator expressed concerns about the implications of such appointments, arguing that military officers don’t undergo the same rigorous selection processes as civilian bureaucrats. He emphasized the need for expertise and relevant experience in leading institutions, which military officers might lack.
Tariq’s video also touched upon the recently released National Corruption Perception Index in Pakistan. Shockingly, the judiciary and police were listed among the top three corrupt institutions in the country. Tariq shared an allegorical story highlighting the perceived corruption within the court system, raising questions about the judiciary’s role in the nation’s governance.
The video concluded with a reflection on the historical alignment of the judiciary with the military, endorsing martial laws and raising questions about the accountability mechanisms for judges and bureaucrats. Tariq urged viewers to consider the hidden motives behind these dynamics, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in order to address corruption concerns.
The video garnered attention due to its critical perspective on the influence of the military in civilian institutions, as well as its call for accountability in a country grappling with corruption challenges.
Post Comment