Dirty game plan of Supreme Court & Qazi Faez Esa Exposed | Lahore Bar Imp step | Sami Ibrahim

welcome to ai point news.
Barrister Ittisham Ameeruddin, several significant legal developments in Pakistan were discussed. The vlog covered three main topics: the response of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa to Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan’s objections, the re-examination of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s case by the Naurukni Larger Bench, and the acquittal in Mian Nawaz Sharif’s Al-Aziziyah reference.

Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa responded to Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan’s concerns regarding the formation of the 6-member Naurukni Larger Bench for the military courts’ case. Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan had expressed dissatisfaction, stating that he was not consulted, and the Chief Justice addressed this in his response. Chief Justice Isa claimed that his doors were always open, but Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan neither called nor met him to discuss his reservations. The vlog suggested a growing cold war within the Supreme Court, impacting its credibility.

The vlog then turned to the judicial reference on Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, which has been re-examined by the Naurukni Larger Bench. The proceedings were live-streamed, and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s remarks were highlighted. The vlog emphasized the historical injustice faced by Bhutto and the importance of delivering justice even in cases from decades ago. However, it raised concerns about whether the same passion for justice would be shown in present-day matters.

Lastly, the vlog discussed the acquittal in Mian Nawaz Sharif’s Al-Aziziyah reference, clearing the path for his potential return to politics. The Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court, Atar Minallah, played a significant role in this decision, highlighting the recent amendment in the election act, limiting the disqualification period to a maximum of five years.

The vlog concluded by addressing speculations about potential election delays, with Ali Zardari indicating concerns about the election atmosphere. Despite the positive developments for Nawaz Sharif, there were hints of political insecurity and manipulation fears, suggesting the possibility of postponed elections.

In a recent video by Sami Ibrahim, several crucial legal developments have come to light, creating a storm within Pakistan’s legal and political landscape. The video touches upon allegations of hypocrisy within the Supreme Court, an open letter written by Mazahir Naqvi accusing Justice Qazi Faiz Isa of breaking the law, and speculations about a potential conspiracy involving judges’ retirement ages.

Allegations of Hypocrisy within Supreme Court:
Mazahir Naqvi, in an open letter addressed to all judges, including the Chief Justice, has raised serious allegations against Justice Qazi Faiz Isa. Naqvi accuses Qazi Faiz Isa of violating the law and going against fundamental rights. The letter emphasizes that Naqvi, who has transparently declared all his properties to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), is facing questioning, while another judge, yet to disclose properties, remains unchallenged.

Speculations on Judges’ Retirement Age Conspiracy:
Speculations have emerged regarding an alleged understanding or agreement between the corridors of power to extend the retirement age of judges by two years. This supposed arrangement would benefit Qazi Faiz Isa as the first beneficiary, followed by Mansoor Ali Shah. The speculated motive behind this plan is to prevent Justice Jazal Hassan from becoming the Chief Justice.

Supreme Judicial Council’s Unprecedented Meeting:
The video reveals that the Supreme Judicial Council has been called for an unprecedented meeting on December 14. It is suggested that Mazahir Naqvi’s release is imminent, and a three-member bench is scheduled to hear his petition on December 15. Speculations arise that the Supreme Judicial Council’s decision will render the hearing infructuous.

Legal Community’s Reaction and Confrontation:
The Lahore High Court Bar Association has held a general body meeting, criticizing the establishment of military courts and rejecting any attempt to divert them in this regard. This rejection of military courts and other legal issues discussed in various benches may lead to a severe confrontation between judges and the legal community.

Concerns Over Election Commission’s Actions:
The video also touches upon concerns about the Election Commission’s actions, indicating potential favoritism in the administration’s appointment of returning officers. The absence of judicial representatives in the election process raises questions about its fairness and transparency.